Should TV have made instrumental copies of instrumentals?
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:34 pm
Reading Veenture's thread "DOWNLOADING VENTURES TUNES..." and his quest for "Detour" with a visit to the link he provides with the song made me think of something that some of you may agree with and disagree with. I heard The Ventures version of "Detour" and quickly listened to Duane Eddy's superior version to "wash" my ears!
It goes without saying that I'm a The Ventures fan from the '60s to this moment as I type this and if you read my introduction you can see that I'm a in-their-face fan. But I have a bone to pick. I loved their versions of popular (and not so-popular) hits that were originally vocals, e.g., "A Taste Of Honey" by The Beatles. Hearing The Ventures instrumental version is a very pleasant experience. Ditto for the many vocal versions they turned into instrumentals.
However, how could they do instrumental versions of instrumental hits? And "Detour" is an example of a version that is not as good as the original artist. I feel this way about The Beatles songs also. I've heard tons of other artists doing The Beatles songs and they just don't measure. One exception: "Lady Madonna" by Antoine "Fats" Domino.
Of course, it goes without saying that except for the possibility of Los Straitjackets being the best "imitators" of The Ventures, I really don't care for anything I've heard similar-wise including a couple of Japanese groups such as The Mosriters, etc. When The Ventures did "their" stuff, they were/are unbeatable.
Duane Eddy is a mold; The Beatles are a mold; The Ventures are a mold.
The Beatles did other peoples' stuff (Motown) and sometimes improved on the songs. But I haven't heard The Ventures sound better than Duane, Jorgen Ingmann, etc. And forget The Shadows, that's all they are.
Anyway, them's my 2 cents.
It goes without saying that I'm a The Ventures fan from the '60s to this moment as I type this and if you read my introduction you can see that I'm a in-their-face fan. But I have a bone to pick. I loved their versions of popular (and not so-popular) hits that were originally vocals, e.g., "A Taste Of Honey" by The Beatles. Hearing The Ventures instrumental version is a very pleasant experience. Ditto for the many vocal versions they turned into instrumentals.
However, how could they do instrumental versions of instrumental hits? And "Detour" is an example of a version that is not as good as the original artist. I feel this way about The Beatles songs also. I've heard tons of other artists doing The Beatles songs and they just don't measure. One exception: "Lady Madonna" by Antoine "Fats" Domino.
Of course, it goes without saying that except for the possibility of Los Straitjackets being the best "imitators" of The Ventures, I really don't care for anything I've heard similar-wise including a couple of Japanese groups such as The Mosriters, etc. When The Ventures did "their" stuff, they were/are unbeatable.
Duane Eddy is a mold; The Beatles are a mold; The Ventures are a mold.
The Beatles did other peoples' stuff (Motown) and sometimes improved on the songs. But I haven't heard The Ventures sound better than Duane, Jorgen Ingmann, etc. And forget The Shadows, that's all they are.
Anyway, them's my 2 cents.